
Rocky Rebooted by AI: Stallone’s ‘Real Life’ Stunt Was Never Real
Sylvester Stallone’s viral stunt video has garnered millions of views, with fans convinced that the 80-year-old is still performing his own career-defying stunts. However, the video is AI-generated.
A viral video shows 80-year-old Sylvester Stallone performing an intense action sequence in what appears to be behind-the-scenes footage from a movie. He is seen jumping and flipping amid explosions and heavy trucks.
The user named @fajihat0 posted this video on X on Aug 23, with the caption, “Sylvester Stallone is 80 years old and yet look at how he is performing in an action Movie Can you jump like this at that age?” The video has amassed over 1.8 million views and more than 11k likes.

Several other social media accounts in India have also circulated similar videos. Instagram user aastha_sriv reposted a video originally shared by bts_mystery_07 with the caption ‘goal.’

The reel’s text reads, ‘POV: I think I’m in good shape for 40,’ comparing the user with Sylvester Stallone at age 80. The post has more than 167k likes and 3.8 million views. The post features two videos of the actor performing daring stunts.
Another user, @sushilskinner, posted a similar video on 28 August. The video shows him performing a gravity-defying stunt in what appears to be a dam.

The video features a caption that reads, “Ladies and gentlemen, this is Sylvester Stallone, also known as John Rambo, at 80 years old. It is so important what you eat, regular exercise, and peace of mind. Is this not mind-blowing? Isn’t it motivating for those who have given up, saying they are too old? Keep living; life is beautiful.”
A user named Riya_035 posted on X, with the caption “Sylvester Stallone (Rocky) rocking even at the age of 80!” and adding, “Sylvester Stallone performing stunts himself even at the age of 80… Real life ROCKY!!”

The post, shared August 23, 2026, had garnered 2,023 views as of 28 August.
What’s the Real Story?
Many users commented on the video and flagged it as AI-generated. They also claimed that “The crew wearing all the same t-shirts is a dead giveaway…🙄”.
We examined the viral video closely and identified numerous discrepancies. Upon closer inspection, it became clear that the actor appears to perform the action sequences without visible safety measures or precautions. No harness is visible on the actor in the video. This appears inconsistent with the safety protocols typically followed for high-risk stunt work in Hollywood productions. Similarly, for the explosion shot, the actor appears to be at extremely close range to the blast. The apparent absence of a visible safety perimeter or other protective measures raises further questions about the authenticity of the footage. In addition, the OBC team used Hive AI to assess whether the video was an AI-generated video.

The results estimated that the video had a 59.1% likelihood of being AI-generated.
Furthermore, for clearer context, we conducted a reverse image search using key frames from the video. This led us to an Instagram post shared by the account wonderfulworldai62.

The page has close to 28,000 followers and describes itself as an AI creator ‘exploring extraordinary moments, untold stories and realities beyond imagination ’. The account appears to be dedicated to AI-generated behind-the-scenes-style footage of the film production process. It features more than 13 AI-generated videos of Sylvester Stallone alone.
Despite the widespread circulation of the AI-generated videos online, the actor has not commented on them so far.

His official Instagram account continues to feature posts about his professional and personal life.
Even though the video has very convincing details and has gone viral, the evidence strongly indicates that it was generated by AI, rather than showing Stallone performing dangerous stunts at the age of 80. It serves as a timely reminder that even the most ‘unbelievable’ viral videos warrant closer scrutiny before being shared. As AI-generated content becomes increasingly sophisticated, this example shows that seeing is not necessarily believing.
